1113 replies to this topic

[Gym_Class_Hero]

Well, with some of the feedback in the Site Feedback forum, people thought that we should have one simple thread for shots that you want to run people here by before sending them to Airliners.net or Jetphotos.net. People are begining to get mad by the amount of "will it make it" threads. So why not make one, simple, thread!

This will also become a good collection of aircraft pics.

So lets post 'em here!

Edited by ___, 09 September 2007 - 01:27 AM.

[Captainmk]

This would need to be pinned to have any effect at all

[Gym_Class_Hero]

Well, if no one is going to post, I guess I will.



?

[prince]

i don't see the motif...though if u wan to do a lineup shots..its better to get some closeups...

[Chief_Bean]

No -- it won't make it IMO.

prince is right about the motive too

[Wokhead]

Do you have any of the same quality? But with more of the aircraft In? And them in more of a straight line relative to the angle of the shot. Basically More of a line up.

If you don't I'd suggest you crop the excess off to the side. and Stop after the Twin. Take the one in the far background with the Red cover on out of the picture.

[Gym_Class_Hero]

This is my best line up. I have some other good close ups though.

I can't post 'em now though, I have to go fly model rockets with my rocket club.

Edited by ___, 09 September 2007 - 12:49 PM.

[Wokhead]

Righto Np. Have Fun!

[ZaurisLJ25]

this image got rejected at A.net because........

Quote

These photo(s) show a motive that is not accepted by Airliners.net. This
problem may be due to a very wide range of reasons, from photos that
include unwanted window reflections to photos showing other subjects than
aircraft. Also, certain kinds of so-called "creative" photos may be more
prone to this problem.

any clues???... i didn't really understand the reason why it got rejected

[Chief_Bean]

Is it the gauge/window reflections?

[Wokhead]

Think it's the glare On the Engine Instruments

[Fokker_F27]

ZaurisLJ25, on Sep 9 2007, 12:52 PM, said:

this image got rejected at A.net because........

Quote

These photo(s) show a motive that is not accepted by Airliners.net. This
problem may be due to a very wide range of reasons, from photos that
include unwanted window reflections to photos showing other subjects than
aircraft. Also, certain kinds of so-called "creative" photos may be more
prone to this problem.

any clues???... i didn't really understand the reason why it got rejected

1: Kind of dark, but I don't think that's the main problem.
2: Grainy background
3: panel glare
4: hands and the aircraft ceiling in the upper-left corner.

Not much you can do about the last 2 items I'm afraid, but it you re-edit the original, you may be able to fix the first two.

[mulletman]

what do you think about these?




any advice would be great.

Fred

[prince]

first one might make it....though.. 2nd and 3rd..kinda blur and noisy

[GuttahMastah]

prince, on Sep 10 2007, 06:26 AM, said:

first one might make it....though.. 2nd and 3rd..kinda blur and noisy

What? I think all 3 of them would make it, they look great

[Chief_Bean]

Donovan., on Sep 10 2007, 06:51 PM, said:

prince, on Sep 10 2007, 06:26 AM, said:

first one might make it....though.. 2nd and 3rd..kinda blur and noisy

What? I think all 3 of them would make it, they look great

If I saw the second on A.net, I'd be disappointed

Other photos of better quality have been denied the chance to get on...

The quality just isn't there (noise, softness...)

The first might get on though (like Edwin said )

[Wokhead]

All over sharpened. The Halos round the aircraft are too apparent I'm afraid

[Toshiba-the-3rd]

Any chances .....  

[Locstar]

Adz.., on Sep 10 2007, 10:03 PM, said:

Any chances .....  

No way - Quality is way too low  

[Wokhead]

Do you have the original?