Why do people even make up BS like this?
#21
Posted 29 August 2012 - 02:20 PM
#22
Posted 29 August 2012 - 02:26 PM
Mumbles, on 29 August 2012 - 02:20 PM, said:
#23
Posted 29 August 2012 - 02:26 PM
Mumbles, on 29 August 2012 - 02:20 PM, said:
Volume of a cylinder = pi * r^2 * h
Weight is... weight.
What is confusing?
#24
Posted 29 August 2012 - 02:27 PM
#25
Posted 29 August 2012 - 02:29 PM
Mohammad, on 29 August 2012 - 02:26 PM, said:
Trigonometry was ###### horribly taught in India. I wasn't able to catch up with Physics for a while because of it, you need to visualize and not just ###### memorize
Mohammad, on 29 August 2012 - 02:27 PM, said:
It just might be his afternoon slump, it was late at night when I got my volume wrong by orders of magnitude
Edited by pyruvate, 29 August 2012 - 02:29 PM.
#26
Posted 29 August 2012 - 02:42 PM
Mumbles, on 29 August 2012 - 02:20 PM, said:
It's all very simple...probably just stuff you've forgotten?
Take a simpler example: If I have a 100L capacity box, it should be pretty clear that I can fit 100 1L cartons into the box (100/1 = 100), or 50 2L cartons (100/2 = 50), etc., you get the idea.
Now, we can find online that a nickel has a volume of 688.98 cubic mm, and an A380F cargo hold a maximum capacity of 1,134 cubic m. So, as $1bn = 20bn nickels, 20bn nickels (if packed so there is no space between them) occupy a volume of 20,000,000,000*688.98 cubic mm (number of nickels*volume of one nickel) = 13,779.6 cubic metres. So, if we divide that figure by the cargo hold capacity of an A380F, we can see that it would take 14 A380Fs to fit all those nickels in.
However, in real life, nickels would not fit into a cargo hold leaving no space between them; there will always be air gaps, especially as one can't pack circles together, so one would need a container bigger than 13,779.6 cubic metres. As for the weight, I just took the weight of 20 bn nickels and divided by the max cargo weight of an A380F.
#27
Posted 29 August 2012 - 04:54 PM
pyruvate, on 29 August 2012 - 02:26 PM, said:
Weight is... weight.
What is confusing?
I know Pi, no idea what the rest of that is.
Chief_Bean, on 29 August 2012 - 02:42 PM, said:
Take a simpler example: If I have a 100L capacity box, it should be pretty clear that I can fit 100 1L cartons into the box (100/1 = 100), or 50 2L cartons (100/2 = 50), etc., you get the idea.
Now, we can find online that a nickel has a volume of 688.98 cubic mm, and an A380F cargo hold a maximum capacity of 1,134 cubic m. So, as $1bn = 20bn nickels, 20bn nickels (if packed so there is no space between them) occupy a volume of 20,000,000,000*688.98 cubic mm (number of nickels*volume of one nickel) = 13,779.6 cubic metres. So, if we divide that figure by the cargo hold capacity of an A380F, we can see that it would take 14 A380Fs to fit all those nickels in.
However, in real life, nickels would not fit into a cargo hold leaving no space between them; there will always be air gaps, especially as one can't pack circles together, so one would need a container bigger than 13,779.6 cubic metres. As for the weight, I just took the weight of 20 bn nickels and divided by the max cargo weight of an A380F.
Nope, I never forgot it because I never knew it. In high school we would spend a day, two days if we were lucky, on a subject then it was followed up with a test. When I would tell my teachers "I don't understand how to do this" they would just tell me to look in the book (which made no sense and was several years old) and figure it out because we were "moving on next class". Half the time I would get the general idea of the subject, half the time I would only confuse my self worse. Maybe I'm just no good at math, I don't know...
Your post made more sense to me than anything I was taught in any of my high school math classes.
#28
Posted 29 August 2012 - 05:01 PM
Mumbles, on 29 August 2012 - 04:54 PM, said:
Nope, I never forgot it because I never knew it. In high school we would spend a day, two days if we were lucky, on a subject then it was followed up with a test. When I would tell my teachers "I don't understand how to do this" they would just tell me to look in the book (which made no sense and was several years old) and figure it out because we were "moving on next class". Half the time I would get the general idea of the subject, half the time I would only confuse my self worse. Maybe I'm just no good at math, I don't know...
Your post made more sense to me than anything I was taught in any of my high school math classes.
What pryuvate mentions is the formula for the volume of a cylinder: π*(r^2)*h, where r is the radius of the cross-sectional circle, and h is the height of the cylinder. It makes intuitive sense since the formula for the area of a circle is π*(r^2), and a cylinder is effectively...a lot of circles (if you want to think of them as flat, 2D objects, think disks) stacked on top of each other to a height of h.
And thanks...I worry about my ability to articulate even simple mathematical concepts, so that's some relief! It's a shame that teaching of maths is often so poor (there's a multitude of reasons), but couple that with a general unwillingness to learn or enjoy it, and it's a recipe for disaster!
#29
Posted 29 August 2012 - 05:18 PM
Chief_Bean, on 29 August 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
Reminded me of integration applications to 3D figures. Need to review that stuff before Physical Chemistry gets crazy in the Winter semester, looking forward to Schrodigner's equations. Not looking forward to the exams.
#30
Posted 29 August 2012 - 06:59 PM
#32
Posted 31 August 2012 - 07:15 AM
#33
Posted 31 August 2012 - 06:51 PM