26 replies to this topic

[Neno8402]

[Maverick90]

cool shots!

[Lewis Nicoletti]

thts not the cls a340-600 :S i don't think

but nice shots anway

Edited by Lewis15, 19 March 2007 - 01:15 PM.

[luftya340-600]

that aint CLS a340-600, nice shots

[Neno8402]

I really don't care what it is. When I downloaded it thats what it was labled. As long as it looks decent (aircraft build-wise) I am satisfied. Thanks for the compliments.

[ZaurisLJ25]

Neno8402, on Mar 19 2007, 04:09 PM, said:

I really don't care what it is. When I downloaded it thats what it was labled. As long as it looks decent (aircraft build-wise) I am satisfied. Thanks for the compliments.

yea it looks decent...... however, CLS is payware.....

gd shots, bro

Edited by ZaurisLJ25, 19 March 2007 - 05:04 PM.

[Manny]

can u post a link? and cool shots!

[Neno8402]

Thanks everyone!

Craz-E if you were asking me to post a link I cant because I had to go through ###### and high water to find this plane and I honestly don't have a clue as to where I found it at. All I know is I didn't find it on any of the well-known, major add-on sites.

[Mr. Schutte]

Neno8402, on Mar 19 2007, 05:24 PM, said:

Thanks everyone!

Craz-E if you were asking me to post a link I cant because I had to go through ###### and high water to find this plane and I honestly don't have a clue as to where I found it at. All I know is I didn't find it on any of the well-known, major add-on sites.

  

Quote

I really don't care what it is. When I downloaded it thats what it was labled. As long as it looks decent (aircraft build-wise) I am satisfied.

  

Not the best shots I've seen, as the ground is pretty blurry    Nice effort though, and I'm not callin' you a pirate  

[Manny]

    makes me suspicious

Edited by Craz-E, 19 March 2007 - 06:41 PM.

[Neno8402]

Mr. Schutte, on Mar 19 2007, 06:40 PM, said:

Neno8402, on Mar 19 2007, 05:24 PM, said:

Thanks everyone!

Craz-E if you were asking me to post a link I cant because I had to go through ###### and high water to find this plane and I honestly don't have a clue as to where I found it at. All I know is I didn't find it on any of the well-known, major add-on sites.

Quote

I really don't care what it is. When I downloaded it thats what it was labled. As long as it looks decent (aircraft build-wise) I am satisfied.

  

Not the best shots I've seen, as the ground is pretty blurry    Nice effort though, and I'm not callin' you a pirate  

Look folks I am not on here to win best shots of the year. I am not one of those people who have literally spent thousands of dollars on upgrades to their computers and addons to their flight simulator. I am just posting pics of the aircraft and that is my main concern...not background scenery and realistic trees and wildlife and ground scenery   If this forum is supposed to be more a contest please someone let me know and I won't post anymore because thats not what I joined this site for.

[MIA-PILOT]

its a  Simubuild a340-600 just put simubuild a340-600 in the search bar on avsim and you will see it

[Neno8402]

_.-JCG-._, on Mar 19 2007, 07:07 PM, said:

its a  Simubuild a340-600 just put simubuild a340-600 in the search bar on avsim and you will see it

Thanks mate!

[TND4NOS]

Not bad, some nice angles

[Neno8402]

I appreciate the words of advice from mostly everyone and especially the compliments. I will try to reshoot some SAA pics now that I have fine-tuned my AA and graphics card. We'll see if there's any noticeable improvements.

[gyrate]

i'll be mr obvious here but mad texture blurries. those should be addressed before you even consider touching the AA settings.

if your system lacks the power to run the textures, then it will just die if you want to get any decent AA going.

[Neno8402]

gyrate, on Mar 20 2007, 09:02 AM, said:

i'll be mr obvious here but mad texture blurries. those should be addressed before you even consider touching the AA settings.

if your system lacks the power to run the textures, then it will just die if you want to get any decent AA going.

Once again, I am not taking pics to submit into the "Pic of the Year" contest. I have very powerful system with a 3.2GHz processor and 1GB of memory and a 500GB hard drive. I CHOOSE not to put my settings to max just because its not that serious to me. I don't have any type of amazing graphics/scenery add-ons to justify using up resources to have "amazing" plain ground textures lol.

[gyrate]

Neno8402, on Mar 20 2007, 09:21 AM, said:

gyrate, on Mar 20 2007, 09:02 AM, said:

i'll be mr obvious here but mad texture blurries. those should be addressed before you even consider touching the AA settings.

if your system lacks the power to run the textures, then it will just die if you want to get any decent AA going.

Once again, I am not taking pics to submit into the "Pic of the Year" contest. I have very powerful system with a 3.2GHz processor and 1GB of memory and a 500GB hard drive. I CHOOSE not to put my settings to max just because its not that serious to me. I don't have any type of amazing graphics/scenery add-ons to justify using up resources to have "amazing" plain ground textures lol.

Why not use it if you can do it? What exactly are you saving those resources for?  

Edited by gyrate, 20 March 2007 - 11:13 AM.

[Neno8402]

gyrate, on Mar 20 2007, 11:12 AM, said:

Neno8402, on Mar 20 2007, 09:21 AM, said:

gyrate, on Mar 20 2007, 09:02 AM, said:

i'll be mr obvious here but mad texture blurries. those should be addressed before you even consider touching the AA settings.

if your system lacks the power to run the textures, then it will just die if you want to get any decent AA going.

Once again, I am not taking pics to submit into the "Pic of the Year" contest. I have very powerful system with a 3.2GHz processor and 1GB of memory and a 500GB hard drive. I CHOOSE not to put my settings to max just because its not that serious to me. I don't have any type of amazing graphics/scenery add-ons to justify using up resources to have "amazing" plain ground textures lol.

Why not use it if you can do it? What exactly are you saving those resources for?  

Well AGAIN why am I going to sit there and have my setting at MAX when I don't have any type of amazing add-on scenery to justify it?? Thats like getting a 1983 Pinto fully detailed just because you can afford to. Its an old piece of junk so what would be the reason. Same thing applied to me. I don't have any add-on scenery with lots and lot of building and skyscrappers and vegetation and so forth. So what would be the reason for turning up my setting to max just to make some brown and green pathes simulating the ground, look slightly more brown and green???

[Neno8402]

ArmenianPilot, on Mar 20 2007, 08:10 PM, said:

With a PC with that processor, you should have at least a 64MB video card. Do this:

Right Click on Properties on the Destop>SETTINGS Tab> ADVANCED Button on the bottom>ADAPTER TAB> Tell me the Graphic Supporter, and how much MB of it do you have and tell me if it's written as INTEGRATED or INTERNAL.

That's more important.

*You don't need any Addon Scenery for ground textures, FS comes with a good texture for land and water, if you PC can't handle that, then neither will the addon package if you buy it.

DAC Type: Internal DAC (400MHz)
Memory Size: 128 MB