119 replies to this topic

[Alex_S]

Check out this here video for an X-Plane CRJ200 project, its absolutely mouth watering....im considering X-Plane as a viable alternative now  

[JordanFarmer]

Wow, that does look pretty amazing, i was thinking of getting xplane, but i cant be bothered to convert all the textures for scenery and stuff maybe one day

[Buziel-411_RED]

That is one beautiful aircraft, the VC is stunning.

Digital Aviation is making their own CRJ-200 for MSFS... I'm curious to see how it will compare with this when previews come out in the later stages of development. I know their Do-27 was a great aircraft, so let's hope their CRJ-200 is of the same quality of their previous aircraft for us MSFS flyers.

[Chief_Bean]

Argh, I'm torn between XPlane and FS9.

I only really want to fly the Airsimmer A320 on FS9 and this CRJ on XPlane lol.

[Liam170]

Captain sim has got some competition ,well sort of.

Edited by Liam170, 14 April 2009 - 05:45 PM.

[Buziel-411_RED]

Liam170, on Apr 14 2009, 05:44 PM, said:

Captain sim has got some competition ,well sort of.

If only it was lighter on the FPS. My dual core 2.20GHz processor can't run the CS757 very well.

[SetClimbThrust]

SWEET MOTHER MAIRY

[Noble.]

Liam170, on Apr 14 2009, 11:44 PM, said:

Captain sim has got some competition ,well sort of.

It doesn't take that much for a third-part Add-on company to be competition for Captain Sim.

[Liam170]

buizel, on Apr 14 2009, 05:47 PM, said:

Liam170, on Apr 14 2009, 05:44 PM, said:

Captain sim has got some competition ,well sort of.

If only it was lighter on the FPS. My dual core 2.20GHz processor can't run the CS757 very well.

lmao mine cant run it at all,well it can but thats not without me throwing the pc out the window shouting ''YOU SLOW PIECE OF ****!!''

I had to downgrade my panel to the Freighter panel its alot lighter on frames,but make sure you set it up right.

[Battle_Penguin]

i was following this on an X-Plane forum, they said i might be a beta tester..

[dolbinau]

Probably going to be all form no function, I'll pass!

But it does look nice.

[Sam Millar]

buizel, on Apr 14 2009, 11:47 PM, said:

Liam170, on Apr 14 2009, 05:44 PM, said:

Captain sim has got some competition ,well sort of.

If only it was lighter on the FPS. My dual core 2.20GHz processor can't run the CS757 very well.

My 2.1 Phenom 8450 runs it just fine.

[THBatMan8]

dolbinau, on Apr 14 2009, 07:22 PM, said:

Probably going to be all form no function, I'll pass!

But it does look nice.

+1

[Buziel-411_RED]

Sam Millar, on Apr 14 2009, 06:33 PM, said:

buizel, on Apr 14 2009, 11:47 PM, said:

Liam170, on Apr 14 2009, 05:44 PM, said:

Captain sim has got some competition ,well sort of.

If only it was lighter on the FPS. My dual core 2.20GHz processor can't run the CS757 very well.

My 2.1 Phenom 8450 runs it just fine.

At FSDT KJFK, AI, high levels of AA, in the VC, at 30 FPS, running Vista?

[Alaska_MD-83]

All Form, no function and 1 FPS

[SergeBMW]

X-Plane looks to dull an and dead, unlike FS9

btw the 60-80 gigs of scenery? Heck no

[THBatMan8]

KingOfDaWackos, on Apr 14 2009, 08:59 PM, said:

All Form, no function and 1 FPS

That's 1FPS after you spent 4k on hardware upgrades  

[Buziel-411_RED]

SergeBMW, on Apr 14 2009, 08:02 PM, said:

X-Plane looks to dull an and dead, unlike FS9

btw the 60-80 gigs of scenery? Heck no

FSX with REX, GEX, UTX, Orbx, Flytampa scenery, and your assorted commercial and GA addons isn't event 45GB.

[David_Lee_Roth]

KingOfDaWackos, on Apr 14 2009, 07:59 PM, said:

All Form, no function and 1 FPS

You need to stop smoking things.


It has been stated it will have a functioning FMC, and X-plane is much nicer on frames than FSX or FS9.

My fs9 comp (Core 2 Duo 2.6 Ghz, RADEON 3670, and 2 gigs of RAM) runs X-Plane 9 better than FS9, and that's at even higher settings.

[Buziel-411_RED]

Sukhoi Alex, on Apr 14 2009, 08:13 PM, said:

KingOfDaWackos, on Apr 14 2009, 07:59 PM, said:

All Form, no function and 1 FPS

You need to stop smoking things.


It has been stated it will have a functioning FMC, and X-plane is much nicer on frames than FSX or FS9.

My fs9 comp (Core 2 Duo 2.6 Ghz, RADEON 3670, and 2 gigs of RAM) runs X-Plane 9 better than FS9, and that's at even higher settings.

There is more to an aircraft than a functioning FMC...

Are you running anything like Flytampa or FSDT in X-Plane?