Pierre., on Aug 14 2009, 11:28 AM, said:
Jambone, on Aug 14 2009, 11:50 AM, said:
Thanks again for the comments all. We will be operating on the VATSIM network, so far there are no plans to operate on IVAO.
Cheers,
James
Why not?
None of our team have used IVAO, therefor would have no technical support to supply should anything go wrong. Plus, we'd rather know the manner our pilots are flying in, and all this can be monitored via various tools and applications on VATSIM.
Arm Out The Heli, on Aug 14 2009, 11:35 AM, said:
You've got a good one to contend with which, if I'm going by your press release and theirs (and the fact they've got a website), is set to give you stiff competition..
http://forums.vatsim...hp?f=25&t=42402
http://ekvirtual.net/
To be honest if you're planning to do this and also Jet2, both are going to turn out worse than you expect. More enthusiasm than commitment, time and sense. Don't throw all your eggs in one basket. Work on a virtual airline that's not being resembled well and focus on it. EKVirtual looks good and better than yours I'm afraid. Many would prefer to see a Jet2 virtual for they operate routes that are the busiest with virtual pilots.
I beg to differ. Until you have seen a website's layout, then please do not comment on who looks better or not. We have a big enough team now to be able to work on both airlines simultaneously. Like I said before, work hasn't stopped on Jet2VIRTUAL and it will continue to make progress.