iranair787, on Jul 11 2010, 05:48 AM, said:
0
Modeling Pics
Started by
Parachute
, Jul 10 2010 07:53 PM
37 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 11 July 2010 - 12:09 PM
Well I didn't use my computer to modify them in anyway. And I thought that if my pics belong in graphics workshop shouldn't everyone else's in off topic? Someone clarify for me?
#22
Posted 11 July 2010 - 12:54 PM
Nationality = Southern Asia. Couldn't say much more.
#24
Posted 11 July 2010 - 01:25 PM
At least 16 surely.
Shocked she's 13, would still give it a go though...
Shocked she's 13, would still give it a go though...
Edited by Max., 11 July 2010 - 01:38 PM.
#25
Posted 11 July 2010 - 01:28 PM
Obligatory
#26
Posted 11 July 2010 - 01:48 PM
gDGDVf8Zk98
#27
Posted 11 July 2010 - 01:49 PM
FSW: exposing possible paedophiles since 2010.
#30
Posted 11 July 2010 - 02:15 PM
Max - Ill make it feel really good for you hun
#31
Posted 11 July 2010 - 04:39 PM
Parachute - In your original post you asked for tips on the photographs. The Graphics Workshop sub-forum is definitely the place for this type of topic (as it says under its title on the forum), not Off Topic.
#32
Posted 11 July 2010 - 05:20 PM
she's not 13!! she looks like 17-18
#33
Posted 11 July 2010 - 09:42 PM
She looks about 13 to me actually. Those are quite nice shots btw. Few minor issues that Toby addressed, but they're good.
off topic for a sec:
Anyone ever go on chatroulette with a picture of Chris Hansen as their webcam image? Can be amusing.
off topic for a sec:
Anyone ever go on chatroulette with a picture of Chris Hansen as their webcam image? Can be amusing.
#34
Posted 12 July 2010 - 07:45 PM
She's your neighbor? The I'm moving to Iceland.
#35
Posted 12 July 2010 - 08:31 PM
Let this thread die. If I keep seeing the first picture I'll become a pedobear.
#37
Posted 16 July 2010 - 05:35 PM
She looks older on the first couple of pictures but younger on the latest ones..
Lighting is all around good however I don't like the post proscesing on the last 3 pictures, you could have make them look better without all that halo/contrast/brightness applied..
just my 2cents !
Lighting is all around good however I don't like the post proscesing on the last 3 pictures, you could have make them look better without all that halo/contrast/brightness applied..
just my 2cents !
#38
Posted 16 July 2010 - 10:53 PM
Toby Werner, on Jul 10 2010, 07:52 PM, said:
2,6,7 lack contrast. In shot 6, it looks like the "halo effect" is a bit exaggerated and doesn't make it look very good in my opinion. In 3, although I like the way her arm seems to blend in with the white, it's a bit too much. Make her arm stand out a bit more. Other than that these look really great quality wise! Well done!
I like how you were able to white-out the background in the third, but there's too much headroom (better overexposed than underexposed anyways), along with a few others.
BTW, did you shoot RAW?
...I guessed she was 17.