16 replies to this topic

[Captain Sim]

Captain Sim is pleased to publish the very first screenshots of its '757-200 Captain' Sim project.
You can check them out at: http://www.captainsi...?num=1139951148

[Prancer]

Looks pretty cool...

Will there be a demo version of this? (with both wings and horizontial stabilizers? But if it is missing a wing, could you at least put that notice at the top of the list this time and not after all the features that get everyone so excited? It's rather mis-leading reading all that then at the bottom 'Oh! By the way, it's missing a wing and part of that tail....')

Edited by Zarquen, 16 February 2006 - 03:54 PM.

[[V1]-[VR]-[V2]]

Zarquen, on Feb 16 2006, 09:45 PM, said:

Looks pretty cool...

Will there be a demo version of this? (with both wings and horizontial stabilizers?)

it even made me not download the demo

C130...

Edited by [V1]-[VR]-[V2], 16 February 2006 - 03:51 PM.

[pixarfreak1]

IMO the shots look  

[AsianFlyer.]

What happened to the 767?

[TaterSalad]

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

[Slippi]

casonf, on Feb 17 2006, 01:51 AM, said:

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

I'd personally prefer the CS 757 than the LDS.

[AsianFlyer.]

Slippi, on Feb 17 2006, 05:52 AM, said:

casonf, on Feb 17 2006, 01:51 AM, said:

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

I'd personally prefer the CS 757 than the LDS.

Why? Neither of them has come out yet

[dolbinau]

Slippi, on Feb 17 2006, 09:52 PM, said:

casonf, on Feb 17 2006, 01:51 AM, said:

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

I'd personally prefer the CS 757 than the LDS.

Unless I missed something - How can you prefer the CS 757 to the LDS 757 when the latter doesn't have any previews, anywhere.

Edited by dolbinau, 17 February 2006 - 04:14 PM.

[TaterSalad]

dolbinau, on Feb 17 2006, 04:07 PM, said:

Slippi, on Feb 17 2006, 09:52 PM, said:

casonf, on Feb 17 2006, 01:51 AM, said:

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

I'd personally prefer the CS 757 than the LDS.

Unless I missed something - How can you prefer the CS 757 to the LDS 757 when the latter doesn't have any previews, anywhere.

Well, being the LDS freak that you are, Cam, I think its safe to say that LDS isnt gonna ###### their 75 up under the 767. Its just not gonna happen. Specualtively, thats my opinion. But I honestly think that there is no way that it is gonna be less quality than that of the 767. I mean ther is very little they need to do to the systems and flight deck anyways.

[Jet]

Yes, definately Captain Sim 757, looks good. Their modelling always looks more realistic to me.  I had a 767 level d, although the aircraft is very good, in my opinion, I did not think the modelling was as good.  Just a shame Captain Sim didn't release their 767.

Looking forward to the 757.

[Scott Gentry]

I can't stand CS anymore. I'll be getting the LDS over CS anyday.

[RoniisH]

casonf, on Feb 17 2006, 08:51 AM, said:

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

are you kidding? compare captain sim's 767 VC with the LDS. Captain sim's 767 VC outruns LDS's VC so bad.

[Captain Sim]

Thanks everybody for comments
We have published an extensive preview of '757-200 Captain' Sim project.
'Block A' 36 screenshots and features information are now available at: http://www.captainsim.com

[Slippi]

dolbinau, on Feb 17 2006, 04:07 PM, said:

Slippi, on Feb 17 2006, 09:52 PM, said:

casonf, on Feb 17 2006, 01:51 AM, said:

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

I'd personally prefer the CS 757 than the LDS.

Unless I missed something - How can you prefer the CS 757 to the LDS 757 when the latter doesn't have any previews, anywhere.

Because I didn't like the LDS 767.

[AsianFlyer.]

Well, I might as well try all three if they all offer moneyback gaurantees

[TaterSalad]

Slippi, on Feb 20 2006, 09:49 AM, said:

dolbinau, on Feb 17 2006, 04:07 PM, said:

Slippi, on Feb 17 2006, 09:52 PM, said:

casonf, on Feb 17 2006, 01:51 AM, said:

bumbulbi, on Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM, said:

What happened to the 767?

Ahh screw the 76. Personally, I think they realized they werent going to be able to compete heavy enough with LDS and wouldnt make the profit that they thought. i dunno, my guess. But definately I think that if they get their 75 out before LDS, they will surely get a busload of sales. Who knows.

I'd personally prefer the CS 757 than the LDS.

Unless I missed something - How can you prefer the CS 757 to the LDS 757 when the latter doesn't have any previews, anywhere.

Because I didn't like the LDS 767.

Well, I do believe your greatly outnumbered. Ronii, I don't fly VC's so I never took notice of the quality of the LDS VC, Il agree with you there.