57 replies to this topic

[SwitchFX]

-Dexter, on Jul 3 2011, 12:22 PM, said:

Most users aren't running a brand new Intel Core i-series CPU, Switchy.

How about this then? The Gulftown's overclocking capabilities are poor compared to relatively equivalent Nehalem processors, where the Nehalem processors are capable of surpassing in overclocking ability. Intel Extreme processors are as useful as nothing.

Furthermore, this is the most ridiculous post I've read yet regarding Flight.

-Dexter, on Jul 3 2011, 09:19 AM, said:

This right here.

What I'm afraid of is the fact that Microsoft is probably developing and testing Flight on their mega machines, probably with Intel i9 superclocked monster processors and triple-SLI setups and whatnot, where it runs fine, but on the rest of our machines would run like crap.

I have a bad feeling this is what happened with FSX (remember when FSX first came out and it was unheard of to run it at maximum settings?)

Even today, most users aren't running FSX on maximum settings.

Edited by SwitchFX, 03 July 2011 - 02:52 PM.

[Jetset]

It has been said that Flight is designed to run on today's hardware. Although that could mean today's top of the range hardware.  

[SwitchFX]

Jetset, on Jul 3 2011, 01:03 PM, said:

It has been said that Flight is designed to run on today's hardware. Although that could mean today's top of the range hardware.  

It makes you wonder whether the developers drink on the job or smoke pot.

[Buziel-411_RED]

Jetset, what album was the image in?

Edited by Buziel-411_RED, 03 July 2011 - 03:13 PM.

[Jetset]

Buziel-411_RED, on Jul 3 2011, 09:12 PM, said:

Jetset, what album was the image in?

January

[Buziel-411_RED]

Jetset, on Jul 3 2011, 03:16 PM, said:

January

Looking at the albums on the Flight website, January has the least images (four, versus six for December and five for the others). It looks to me that, for whatever reason, they decided not to include it in the official release, but accidentally uploaded it to the Facebook page.

[SwitchFX]

SCANDAL!

[-Dexter]

IT'S A CONSPIRACY!

Edited by -Dexter, 03 July 2011 - 05:02 PM.

[CaptainG37]

I think it's fair to say that maybe we should wait for the official word.  I'm still 50/50 about that image being legit.  And if it IS legit, they may have pulled it down because it was a high detail set of objects that probably won't get put into the final release anyway.

[SuperCar1000]

-Dexter, on Jul 1 2011, 05:54 PM, said:

Dat water.  

Is fake...

[-Dexter]

SuperCar1000, on Jul 3 2011, 10:10 PM, said:

Is fake...

Yeah, okay man.

Next you're probably going to tell me that this is fake:




Please.


/s

[SuperCar1000]

-Dexter, on Jul 3 2011, 08:41 PM, said:

Yeah, okay man.

Next you're probably going to tell me that this is fake:


Please.
/s

[alainneedle1]

CaptainG37, on Jul 3 2011, 07:03 PM, said:

I think it's fair to say that maybe we should wait for the official word.  I'm still 50/50 about that image being legit.  And if it IS legit, they may have pulled it down because it was a high detail set of objects that probably won't get put into the final release anyway.

[Peter797]

-Dexter, on Jul 3 2011, 10:41 PM, said:

Yeah, okay man.

Next you're probably going to tell me that this is fake:


Please.
/s

But that's.........DX10!!!!

[-Dexter]

Peter797, on Jul 10 2011, 01:12 PM, said:

But that's.........DX10!!!!

Nah, bro, you should see DX11, much better than DX10.





I can tell by the pixels.

Edited by -Dexter, 10 July 2011 - 12:33 PM.

[BrandonF]

It makes me laugh how people thanked the post by Dexter, as the "thanks" button is supposedly for useful posts.  

[SuperCar1000]

BrandonF, on Jul 10 2011, 06:07 PM, said:

It makes me laugh how people thanked the post by Dexter, as the "thanks" button is supposedly for useful posts.  

They should add a "like" button then

[Spam]

SuperCar1000, on Jul 10 2011, 10:09 PM, said:

They should add a "like" button then

hahah!