Post Your System Specs
#41
Posted 28 October 2005 - 01:43 PM
#42
Posted 28 October 2005 - 02:04 PM
b757, on Oct 28 2005, 01:43 PM, said:
#43
Posted 28 October 2005 - 02:32 PM
#44
Posted 28 October 2005 - 02:38 PM
- P4 3.4GHz 800MHz FSB 2MB Cache
- 1GB DDR2 RAM
- 100GB HDD
- 16xDVD-/+ R/RW with LightScribe
- PCI-Express ATI Radeon X600 256MB dedicated VRAM
- 17" Widescreen BrightView LCD.
The result = great graphics with great frames - I can pretty much set everything to max, except when flying with traffic/online.
Kirk
#45
Posted 28 October 2005 - 04:24 PM
#46
Posted 28 October 2005 - 04:25 PM
jetBlue 32, on Oct 28 2005, 02:32 PM, said:
Processor: $794
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Toledo 1GHz FSB 2 x 1MB L2 Cache Socket 939 Dual Core Processor - Retail
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103544
MOBO: $189
DFI LANPARTY nF4 SLI-DR Socket 939 NVIDIA nForce4 SLI ATX AMD Motherboard - Retail
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16813136151
RAM: $221
CORSAIR XMS 2GB (2 x 1GB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Dual - Retail
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820145486
Video Card: $660
TWO XFX PVT70GUDF7 Geforce 7800GT Video Card - Retail
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814150108
Hard Drive: $115
Western Digital Caviar SE 320GB 3.5" Serial ATA150 Hard Drive - OEM
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822144394
Only $300 Over Budget!
Edited by acsguitar, 28 October 2005 - 04:52 PM.
#47
Posted 28 October 2005 - 05:00 PM
#48
Posted 28 October 2005 - 05:01 PM
jetBlue 32, on Oct 28 2005, 05:00 PM, said:
#49
Posted 28 October 2005 - 05:11 PM
#50
Posted 28 October 2005 - 05:30 PM
Alex
#51
Posted 28 October 2005 - 06:04 PM
#52
Posted 28 October 2005 - 06:36 PM
Alex
I get 20+ FPS with my dothan with the LVL-D 763 virtual cockpit and all the settings maxed, playing with ASV open, UTUSA, BEV, FE, and 1600 x 1200 and its much smoother than my P4 @ 3.6 even when drops below 20FPS which is does happen ...The Chip is at 2.64Ghz.
#53
Posted 28 October 2005 - 07:15 PM
#54
Posted 28 October 2005 - 09:28 PM
AlfFS2004, on Oct 27 2005, 08:02 PM, said:
Alex
http://www.gamepc.co...77BA5CCDA708B1E
Also, the mobo you recommended, P4P800SE supports Prescott and Celeron D CPUs, you'd need a 855 or 915 chipset, there may be others that support the Dothan but the i865 chipset does not.
Coffee
#55
Posted 28 October 2005 - 09:35 PM
CoffeeBreakPro, on Oct 28 2005, 09:28 PM, said:
AlfFS2004, on Oct 27 2005, 08:02 PM, said:
Alex
http://www.gamepc.co...77BA5CCDA708B1E
Also, the mobo you recommended, P4P800SE supports Prescott and Celeron D CPUs, you'd need a 855 or 915 chipset, there may be others that support the Dothan but the i865 chipset does not.
Coffee
Alex
PS those are slower DOTHAN as they run 400Mhz FSB.
Edited by AlfFS2004, 28 October 2005 - 09:37 PM.
#56
Posted 28 October 2005 - 09:50 PM
WHAT????? Go read about the ASUS CT-479.... I am running mine on a 875P chipset how is that..... And clock per clock its faster as I stated on games.... I am getting 7064 at 2.66Ghz (230 X 12, giving me a 920 FSB) on the 3DMark05 with a mild Overclock to the Card 580/600. My Prescott at 3.6Ghz couldnt do this with higher card clocks.. The most it could do was around 6000 marks.
Alex
PS those are slower DOTHAN as they run 400Mhz FSB. [/quote]
To support the Dothan natively he would need the chipsets I mention, the adapter does allow use of the Dothan on some 478pin mobos and to be fair you did mention it. Don't see where you said 'clock per clock its faster as I stated on games', I do see where you are claiming that "they are faster than any P4 while gaming etc and even the AMD FX series." and " Dothan it will Smash anything overclocked even the FX series". I don't find that to be accurate and maybe I am nit picking (been known to happen) but perhaps some reviews or benchmark comparisons? I mean I pull 6502 on 3Dmark05 with no OC on my AMD64 4000. I'm not trying to challenge you here or show you up, I just want to make sure we are providing accurate information to a guy that is about to drop two grand based on recommendations made here.
Coffee
#57
Posted 28 October 2005 - 09:57 PM
System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 10/28/2005, 20:50:08
Machine name:
Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2 (2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
System Model: Dimension 4700
BIOS: Phoenix ROM BIOS PLUS Version 1.10 A05
Processor: Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 1534MB RAM
Page File: 212MB used, 1942MB available
Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904)
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
DxDiag Version: 5.03.2600.2180 32bit Unicode
------------
DxDiag Notes
------------
DirectX Files Tab: No problems found.
Display Tab 1: No problems found.
Sound Tab 1: No problems found.
Sound Tab 2: No problems found.
Music Tab: No problems found.
Input Tab: No problems found.
Network Tab: No problems found.
--------------------
DirectX Debug Levels
--------------------
Direct3D: 0/4 (n/a)
DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail)
DirectInput: 0/5 (n/a)
DirectMusic: 0/5 (n/a)
DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail)
DirectSound: 0/5 (retail)
DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)
---------------
Display Devices
---------------
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce 6800
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Chip type: GeForce 6800
DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_00C1&SUBSYS_024510DE&REV_A2
Display Memory: 256.0 MB
Current Mode: 1024 x 768 (32 bit) (75Hz)
Monitor: Dell 1704FPT (Digital)
Monitor Max Res: 1280,1024
Driver Name: nv4_disp.dll
Driver Version: 6.14.0010.7124 (English)
DDI Version: 9 (or higher)
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Driver Date/Size: 12/15/2004 12:01:00, 4033152 bytes
WHQL Logo'd: n/a
WHQL Date Stamp: n/a
VDD: n/a
Mini VDD: nv4_mini.sys
Mini VDD Date: 12/15/2004 12:01:00, 3329504 bytes
Device Identifier: {D7B71E3E-4381-11CF-BA68-4F2203C2CB35}
Vendor ID: 0x10DE
Device ID: 0x00C1
SubSys ID: 0x024510DE
Revision ID: 0x00A2
Revision ID: 0x00A2
Video Accel: ModeMPEG2_A ModeMPEG2_B ModeMPEG2_C ModeMPEG2_D ModeWMV9_B ModeWMV9_A
Deinterlace Caps: {212DC724-3235-44A4-BD29-E1652BBCC71C}: Format(In/Out)=(YUY2,YUY2) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,1) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_PixelAdaptive
{335AA36E-7884-43A4-9C91-7F87FAF3E37E}: Format(In/Out)=(YUY2,YUY2) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,0) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_BOBVerticalStretch
{212DC724-3235-44A4-BD29-E1652BBCC71C}: Format(In/Out)=(UYVY,UYVY) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,1) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_PixelAdaptive
{335AA36E-7884-43A4-9C91-7F87FAF3E37E}: Format(In/Out)=(UYVY,UYVY) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,0) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_BOBVerticalStretch
{212DC724-3235-44A4-BD29-E1652BBCC71C}: Format(In/Out)=(YV12,0x32315659) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,1) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_PixelAdaptive
{335AA36E-7884-43A4-9C91-7F87FAF3E37E}: Format(In/Out)=(YV12,0x32315659) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,0) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_BOBVerticalStretch
{212DC724-3235-44A4-BD29-E1652BBCC71C}: Format(In/Out)=(NV12,0x3231564e) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,1) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_PixelAdaptive
{335AA36E-7884-43A4-9C91-7F87FAF3E37E}: Format(In/Out)=(NV12,0x3231564e) Frames(Prev/Fwd/Back)=(0,0,0) Caps=VideoProcess_YUV2RGB VideoProcess_StretchX VideoProcess_StretchY DeinterlaceTech_BOBVerticalStretch
Registry: OK
DDraw Status: Enabled
D3D Status: Enabled
AGP Status: Enabled
DDraw Test Result: Not run
D3D7 Test Result: Not run
D3D8 Test Result: Not run
D3D9 Test Result: Not run
#58
Posted 29 October 2005 - 12:07 AM
WHAT????? Go read about the ASUS CT-479.... I am running mine on a 875P chipset how is that..... And clock per clock its faster as I stated on games.... I am getting 7064 at 2.66Ghz (230 X 12, giving me a 920 FSB) on the 3DMark05 with a mild Overclock to the Card 580/600. My Prescott at 3.6Ghz couldnt do this with higher card clocks.. The most it could do was around 6000 marks.
Alex
PS those are slower DOTHAN as they run 400Mhz FSB. [/QUOTE]
To support the Dothan natively he would need the chipsets I mention, the adapter does allow use of the Dothan on some 478pin mobos and to be fair you did mention it. Don't see where you said 'clock per clock its faster as I stated on games', I do see where you are claiming that "they are faster than any P4 while gaming etc and even the AMD FX series." and " Dothan it will Smash anything overclocked even the FX series". I don't find that to be accurate and maybe I am nit picking (been known to happen) but perhaps some reviews or benchmark comparisons? I mean I pull 6502 on 3Dmark05 with no OC on my AMD64 4000. I'm not trying to challenge you here or show you up, I just want to make sure we are providing accurate information to a guy that is about to drop two grand based on recommendations made here.
Coffee [/quote]
Would you like to see my benches?
Alex
#59
Posted 29 October 2005 - 12:13 AM
Would you like to see my benches?
Alex [/quote]
lol, sure, if they are 'smashing' the AMD64 FX series. Benchmarks aside there are other issues to consider such as up-grade path. Going the Dothan-adapter-i865 route leaves an incredibly small up-grade path, the 478 pin Northwoods are already tapped out which leaves you Dothan upgrades for as far as the bios/chipset will support it, no dual cores, no DDR2. There is computing beyond todays benchmark, a serious socket 939 onan SLI board can be built in the $2k range leaving up-grades down the road for a second vid card and dual core CPUs.
Coffee
#60
Posted 29 October 2005 - 01:33 AM