Ryanair: Caught Napping
#21
Posted 18 December 2006 - 08:52 AM
I'm sure many other airlines are like this.
#22
Posted 18 December 2006 - 10:30 AM
#23
Posted 18 December 2006 - 10:39 AM
But somehow I don't think the majority of people who fly with Ryannair care about the quality of service more than the price
#24
Posted 18 December 2006 - 11:17 AM
#25
Posted 18 December 2006 - 11:18 AM
#26
Posted 18 December 2006 - 11:58 AM
#27
Posted 18 December 2006 - 11:59 AM
crashlandingkid, on Dec 18 2006, 10:18 AM, said:
#28
Posted 18 December 2006 - 12:14 PM
#29
Posted 18 December 2006 - 12:16 PM
TheKid, on Dec 18 2006, 04:59 PM, said:
crashlandingkid, on Dec 18 2006, 10:18 AM, said:
#30
Posted 18 December 2006 - 12:23 PM
767-300ER, on Dec 18 2006, 05:14 PM, said:
#31
Posted 18 December 2006 - 01:14 PM
Tim., on Dec 18 2006, 12:23 PM, said:
767-300ER, on Dec 18 2006, 05:14 PM, said:
I mean, I'm sure it's sanitary to not clean up sick.
I'm sure it's completely safe to allow people to fly months on end with only a temp ID.
And we all know it's incredibly safe to not check passports.
Sure they only showed the bad points, but it's not like the bad points were all THAT bad!
These are bad points that not a single airline should have. I'd only buy your argument if the video showed things such as bad customer service, or the landing wasn't soft enough. Or other things like that that don't violate safety.... when it gets as bad as that, "they only showed the bad points" is not a valid argument.
#32
Posted 18 December 2006 - 01:19 PM
You get what you pay for and the airline is trying to make a profit and these are the only ways it can.
If everybody hated Ryanair so much, why was the passenger numbers for 2005 at 35 million? Sure some of those passengers may not have enjoyed the flight but many wouldnt be bothered and would just be happy that they had a little extra money in their pockets.
Then there are parts shown about safety, I think Ryanair has a pretty good safety record if you ask me, just one major incident with an engine fire, the plane was evacuated within 90 seconds.
So just think again please before slagging an airline off.
Chris.
#33
Posted 18 December 2006 - 02:03 PM
Capt. Bulb, on Dec 18 2006, 01:19 PM, said:
You get what you pay for and the airline is trying to make a profit and these are the only ways it can.
If everybody hated Ryanair so much, why was the passenger numbers for 2005 at 35 million? Sure some of those passengers may not have enjoyed the flight but many wouldnt be bothered and would just be happy that they had a little extra money in their pockets.
Then there are parts shown about safety, I think Ryanair has a pretty good safety record if you ask me, just one major incident with an engine fire, the plane was evacuated within 90 seconds.
So just think again please before slagging an airline off.
Chris.
Edited by pieterjan456, 18 December 2006 - 02:04 PM.
#34
Posted 18 December 2006 - 02:46 PM
#35
Posted 18 December 2006 - 03:16 PM
eee722, on Dec 18 2006, 02:46 PM, said:
#36
Posted 18 December 2006 - 03:28 PM
#37
Posted 18 December 2006 - 03:59 PM
And if it's just that show making it up or exaggerating it, then I'm sorry. I take it back.
Edited by Andrewsarchus, 18 December 2006 - 04:00 PM.
#38
Posted 18 December 2006 - 04:08 PM
#39
Posted 18 December 2006 - 05:09 PM
Management should take a book from SWA. Normally, I don't like SWA, but, they run a ###### of a good airline, by any standards, and can still keep costs low...
#40
Posted 18 December 2006 - 05:36 PM
Quote
You get what you pay for and the airline is trying to make a profit and these are the only ways it can.
I don't think you can put a price on safety. It is fair enough they haven't had a major accident yet, but even in the fire they were still criticized:
Quote
I would hate to be under instruction of their crew in an even more serious emergency .
---
I personally think, though, that this is one of several airlines in the world that have similar issues.