British Airways 777-200 Lands short of runway at LHR!
#61
Posted 17 January 2008 - 12:50 PM
#62
Posted 17 January 2008 - 12:52 PM
samdaflyer, on Jan 17 2008, 05:39 PM, said:
Iranair747, on Jan 17 2008, 05:42 PM, said:
Heathrow Airport, on Jan 17 2008, 04:46 PM, said:
JG1324, on Jan 17 2008, 03:09 PM, said:
Salem, on Jan 17 2008, 04:12 PM, said:
ThrottleUp, on Jan 17 2008, 10:33 AM, said:
Apparently the Captain told a tow-truck driver:
"I lost all power and avionics and had to glide it in"
Anyone here happened to listen to the ATC on his scanner at the time of the accident? a distress call should have been published.
WF08, on Jan 17 2008, 11:00 AM, said:
The southern runway is closed though.
I listened to the ATC on my scanner it was an Emergency for the whole Approach and more than that.
Quote
The Air Accidents Investigation Branch is attending the scene.
Heathrow Airport's southern runway was closed immediately after the incident for a period of less than 2hrs and the airport operated single runway operation during that time. The southern runway re-opened for departing aircraft at 14:30 with arriving aircraft landing on the northern runway.
BAA is doing everything possible to minimise disruption to our passengers.
Passengers flying from Heathrow today should contact their airline regarding the status of their flight. Air traffic control is diverting some arriving flights to other airports on a flight by flight basis.
British Airways has issued a helpline for anybody concerned about family and friends: 0800 389 4193.
No delays, Airport Runways both open.
It wasn't going around, both engines and avionics failed over hounslow and they were forced to do such a landing due to a decrease in airspeed. It will be very close to a stall, but because of the slow speed people might have thought it 'dropped like a stone'.
Tell us everything you remember about the ATC! I wish I took my airband radio with me to school today
Nothing ever interesting happens at heathrow
Well some people must live really close.
I am planning to go Saturday for spotting anyway.
http://www.airliners...file?id=1318129
http://www.airliners...file?id=1318128
http://www.airliners...file?id=1318132
The plane Basically called for an emergency on the approach which was a Mayday when i was listening to final director but when they said emergency and they were sorting the traffic out to direct 27R then it was S_TWR i tuned into but i was at school so i mean could not hear much with the teachers telling me to turn it off and like that and there was nothing for a few seconds or so and there was lots of confusion and I could not hear much but it sounded really bad guys but i cant really say the exact words due to the UK Laws 1949* because this is a Major Incident* and i could cause .
Robbie
Edited by Heathrow Airport, 17 January 2008 - 12:59 PM.
#63
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:00 PM
Heathrow Airport, on Jan 17 2008, 01:52 PM, said:
samdaflyer, on Jan 17 2008, 05:39 PM, said:
Iranair747, on Jan 17 2008, 05:42 PM, said:
Heathrow Airport, on Jan 17 2008, 04:46 PM, said:
JG1324, on Jan 17 2008, 03:09 PM, said:
Salem, on Jan 17 2008, 04:12 PM, said:
ThrottleUp, on Jan 17 2008, 10:33 AM, said:
Apparently the Captain told a tow-truck driver:
"I lost all power and avionics and had to glide it in"
Anyone here happened to listen to the ATC on his scanner at the time of the accident? a distress call should have been published.
WF08, on Jan 17 2008, 11:00 AM, said:
The southern runway is closed though.
I listened to the ATC on my scanner it was an Emergency for the whole Approach and more than that.
Quote
The Air Accidents Investigation Branch is attending the scene.
Heathrow Airport's southern runway was closed immediately after the incident for a period of less than 2hrs and the airport operated single runway operation during that time. The southern runway re-opened for departing aircraft at 14:30 with arriving aircraft landing on the northern runway.
BAA is doing everything possible to minimise disruption to our passengers.
Passengers flying from Heathrow today should contact their airline regarding the status of their flight. Air traffic control is diverting some arriving flights to other airports on a flight by flight basis.
British Airways has issued a helpline for anybody concerned about family and friends: 0800 389 4193.
No delays, Airport Runways both open.
It wasn't going around, both engines and avionics failed over hounslow and they were forced to do such a landing due to a decrease in airspeed. It will be very close to a stall, but because of the slow speed people might have thought it 'dropped like a stone'.
Tell us everything you remember about the ATC! I wish I took my airband radio with me to school today
Nothing ever interesting happens at heathrow
Well some people must live really close.
I am planning to go Saturday for spotting anyway.
http://www.airliners...file?id=1318129
http://www.airliners...file?id=1318128
http://www.airliners...file?id=1318132
The plane Basically called for an emergency on the approach which was a Mayday when i was listening to final director but when they said emergency and they were sorting the traffic out to direct 27R then it was S_TWR i tuned into but i was at school so i mean could not hear much with the teachers telling me to turn it off and like that and there was nothing for a few seconds or so and there was lots of confusion and I could not hear much but it sounded really bad guys but i cant really say the exact words due to the UK Laws 1949* because this is a Major Incident* and i could cause .
Robbie
you should have just told the teachers it was important. The crash was at 20 to 1, so it was probably your lunch break!
#64
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:01 PM
Quote
Robbie
#65
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:01 PM
#66
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:08 PM
spitfir3, on Jan 17 2008, 06:01 PM, said:
Quote
Robbie
Origim, on Jan 17 2008, 06:01 PM, said:
Spitfir3 What?
This happened over Housnlow and the avionics went and the plane had no control then there is reports of the engines failed on Approach but i am not sure.
#67
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:08 PM
#68
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:11 PM
Rupert Hughes, on Jan 17 2008, 06:08 PM, said:
Have you seen:
That's less than 800ft and considering the 777 was if on a Normal Situation at a speed of 150knts so looking at this and the reports of the nose 49* up then Stall is Indefinably yes.
At least i know why they use Seatbelts on planes 150-180MPH stopped in less than that then hmmm.,
Edited by Heathrow Airport, 17 January 2008 - 01:14 PM.
#69
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:15 PM
I got to say, seeing the media pictures how much I admire the look of the T7
Edited by Iranair747, 17 January 2008 - 01:15 PM.
#70
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:15 PM
#71
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:16 PM
#73
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:18 PM
samdaflyer, on Jan 17 2008, 01:15 PM, said:
Uh, completely unnecessary?
And as for the news, I would at least wait until they get the ATC recordings out and reviewed. At least you can walk away from an accident like this with your heart still beating and your lungs still breathing. But wow, 800 feet? O_o
Is it going to be on any American news stations tonight? I might have to look into it around 5PM
#74
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:18 PM
Heathrow Airport, on Jan 17 2008, 01:11 PM, said:
Rupert Hughes, on Jan 17 2008, 06:08 PM, said:
Have you seen:
That's less than 800ft and considering the 777 was if on a Normal Situation at a speed of 150knts so looking at this and the reports of the nose 49* up then Stall is Indefinably yes.
At least i know why they use Seatbelts on planes 150-180MPH stopped in less than that then hmmm.,
Edited by Flightsimulatorpilot, 17 January 2008 - 01:19 PM.
#75
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:19 PM
#76
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:19 PM
#77
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:23 PM
I'll warn any of you if your on my flight if i'm planning that
#78
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:29 PM
Flightsimulatorpilot, on Jan 17 2008, 06:18 PM, said:
Heathrow Airport, on Jan 17 2008, 01:11 PM, said:
Rupert Hughes, on Jan 17 2008, 06:08 PM, said:
Have you seen:
That's less than 800ft and considering the 777 was if on a Normal Situation at a speed of 150knts so looking at this and the reports of the nose 49* up then Stall is Indefinably yes.
At least i know why they use Seatbelts on planes 150-180MPH stopped in less than that then hmmm.,
(SH)Iceman, on Jan 17 2008, 06:19 PM, said:
Just a little Hint guys, Wings Punctured rite through, no fire were the fuel that would cause a fire?
Debate?
The pilot himself said the a/c was at a stall on Short Finals.
Edited by Heathrow Airport, 17 January 2008 - 01:33 PM.
#79
Posted 17 January 2008 - 01:32 PM