Donovan., on Jan 18 2009, 01:27 AM, said:
U.S. Airways Jet Crashes in Hudson River
#221
Posted 19 January 2009 - 06:36 AM
#222
Posted 19 January 2009 - 07:36 AM
Iranair747, on Jan 19 2009, 03:36 PM, said:
Donovan., on Jan 18 2009, 01:27 AM, said:
Edited by Salem, 19 January 2009 - 07:37 AM.
#223
Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:11 AM
#224
Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:52 AM
Those birds usually flys in flocks - i have encountered a few of those flocks myself... some of those flocks can be 100+
According to Wiki-
The black head and neck with white "chinstrap" distinguish the Canada Goose from all, except the Barnacle Goose, but the latter has a black breast, and grey, rather than brownish, body plumage.[4] There are seven subspecies of this bird, of varying sizes and plumage details, but all are recognizable as Canada Geese. Some of the smaller races can be hard to distinguish from the newly-separated Cackling Goose.
This species is 76-110 cm (30-43 in) long with a 127-180 cm (50-71 in) wingspan.[5] The male usually weighs 3.2–6.5 kg, (7–14 pounds), and can be very aggressive in defending territory. The female looks virtually identical but is slightly lighter at 2.5–5.5 kg (5.5–12 pounds), generally 10% smaller than its male counterpart, and has a different honk. An exceptionally large male of the race B. c. maxima, the "giant Canada goose" (which rarely exceed 8 kg/18 lb), weighed 10.9 kg (24 pounds) and had a wingspan of 2.24 m (88 inches). This specimen is the largest wild goose ever recorded of any species. The life span in the wild is 10–24 years.[5]
#225
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:07 AM
http://www.space.com...ird-threat.html
Quote
Edited by kenair744, 19 January 2009 - 11:08 AM.
#226
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:20 AM
Salem, on Jan 19 2009, 12:36 PM, said:
Iranair747, on Jan 19 2009, 03:36 PM, said:
Donovan., on Jan 18 2009, 01:27 AM, said:
I imagine you'd be able to get a sensor with a fast enough response time to detect a bit before it hits the fans - especially if you have it on the fuselage near the nose (but that far forwards of the engine, angle of attack would start to come into play..) - even on the rim of the engine you could probably detect a foreign object before it got to the fans, but you'd have problems getting the mechanical components of the engine (twisting fans?) to respond fast enough to block something moving at 300mph.
#227
Posted 19 January 2009 - 12:32 PM
#228
Posted 19 January 2009 - 05:03 PM
Quote
Where people get such information I will never know....
#229
Posted 19 January 2009 - 06:30 PM
#231
Posted 19 January 2009 - 07:14 PM
Quote
#232
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:11 PM
kenair744, on Jan 19 2009, 07:30 PM, said:
Every turbine engine on any commercial aircraft goes through that testing. To be certified into service, the engines have to be able to ingest birds, and other FOD, and be able to continue running above a certain N1%; plus many other factors and tests.
#233
Posted 20 January 2009 - 08:44 AM
haha, what a job
Edited by TechnicolorYawn, 20 January 2009 - 08:44 AM.
#235
Posted 23 January 2009 - 08:58 PM
WiCITstsdX8
#236
Posted 23 January 2009 - 09:17 PM
One more:
#238
#239
Posted 24 January 2009 - 09:35 AM
#240
Posted 24 January 2009 - 08:03 PM