142 replies to this topic

[7-5-7]

___, on Nov 27 2010, 12:56 PM, said:

If self-induced stupidity is?

Well for one this it isn't, for another thing if it was, I would still be lacking a mental disability.

[Gym_Class_Hero]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 11:27 PM, said:

Well for one this it isn't, for another thing if it was, I would still be lacking a mental disability.

Your inability to process information and come up with non-stupid results?

[7-5-7]

___, on Nov 27 2010, 12:59 PM, said:

Your inability to process information and come up with non-stupid results?

The results of which I come up with are very opposite to the norm of FSW: my statements are grammaticality correct most of the time, and my posts have some meaning and sense to them.

[Gym_Class_Hero]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 11:33 PM, said:

The results of which I come up with are very opposite to the norm of FSW: my statements are grammaticality correct most of the time, and my posts have some meaning and sense to them.

lulz

[pieterjan456]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 02:03 PM, said:

The results of which I come up with are very opposite to the norm of FSW: my statements are grammaticality correct most of the time, and my posts have some meaning and sense to them.

Sense to you. Not to the other 99% on this forum.
This was it for me. Bye 7-5-7!

[7-5-7]

pieterjan456, on Nov 27 2010, 01:46 PM, said:

Sense to you. Not to the other 99% on this forum.
This was it for me. Bye 7-5-7!

Perhaps so. But what does a child's opinion mean to me? Not much.

[Fate01_VUSAFS]

Guys, you can't argue with facts. Obama HAS spent a lot of money on these trips overseas that really did nothing to benefit the U.S. He also spent a lot of money going around campaigning for the 2010 elections. Yes, all Presidents at some point have campaigned for politicians they support, but Obama has spent a great deal of money and for a man who was all about financial responsibility, he has shown very little effort in having any.

I don't get why any of these posts have to be about Republican-Democrat issues. We should be able to criticize the people in the opposite party for not having the same views we do, but we should also be open enough to criticize the people in our own party that don't do what they were elected to do. I don't see what Glenn Beck has to do with any of this.

I also don't see why people who aren't from the U.S. care so much about how we criticize our politicians and their spending. This isn't a human rights issue; it's an American budget issue, and frankly, it's none of your business. You don't even comment to discuss American issue; you comment to argue with the people in this thread.

Edit:
Dude, don't thank my post. You're annoying me.

Edited by Falcon01, 27 November 2010 - 02:05 PM.

[Romario_]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 12:22 PM, said:

He has betrayed the American people by shoving healthcare down their throats, which ultimately resulted in the changing of house majority.

So, you're telling me a public option for people who can't afford privatized healthcare is bad. Obama isn't shoving anything down your throat <--() but seriously, you really are beginning to sound like Rush Limbaugh Jr. I understand you really dislike him, but as far as I see it, public healthcare is a plus for Americans.

Edited by Santa_Claus, 27 November 2010 - 10:10 PM.

[LA_PHX]

When did this become a thread about health care?  , I guess I missed something over Thanksgiving?

[7-5-7]

Santa_Claus, on Nov 27 2010, 10:00 PM, said:

So, you're telling me a public option for people who can't afford privatized healthcare is bad. Obama isn't shoving anything down your throat <--() but seriously, you really are beginning to sound like Rush Limbaugh Jr. I understand you really dislike him, but as far as I see it, public healthcare is a plus for Americans.

I'm very glad you have your own set of beliefs. However, this healthcare bill failed in the senate, and Obama used a funky way in the House which wouldn't be allowed under normal circumstances. I think Obamacare has an approval rating of thirty-something percent - in other words this bill was disapproved from the start yet he still went ahead and signed it into law.

LA_BOS, on Nov 27 2010, 10:36 PM, said:

I guess I missed something over Thanksgiving?

Yup.

[TopDollar]

This topic is hilarious.  7-5-7, please stop trying to comment about things you know very little about.  The only thing you have accomplished is making yourself look like an even bigger fool.  Especially with the comment you made about grammar.  That in particular was one of the funniest things I have read in a long time.  Especially considering the grammatical incorrectness of the post you said this in.

Please however continue to post frivolous nonsense.  It's quite funny.

also inb4 the thread lock

Edited by TopDollar, 27 November 2010 - 11:22 PM.

[7-5-7]

TopDollar, on Nov 27 2010, 11:20 PM, said:

This topic is hilarious.  7-5-7, please stop trying to comment about things you know very little about.  The only thing you have accomplished is making yourself look like an even bigger fool.  Especially with the comment you made about grammar.  That in particular was one of the funniest things I have read in a long time.  Especially considering the grammatical incorrectness of the post you said this in.

I know very much about this flawed healthcare bill. I have done very little to look like a fool. Lastly, care to share that grammatical error?

[mhockey21]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 09:27 PM, said:

I know very much about this flawed healthcare bill. I have done very little to look like a fool. Lastly, care to share that grammatical error?

Debatable.

[7-5-7]

KrisKringle, on Nov 27 2010, 11:30 PM, said:

Debatable.

Ugh... not really.

[LA_PHX]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 09:32 PM, said:

Ugh... not really.

Well, when multiple people disagree with you and it is a question based on opinion, I'd say it is debatable.

[7-5-7]

Hanukkah_Harry, on Nov 27 2010, 11:34 PM, said:

Well, when multiple people disagree with you and it is a question based on opinion, I'd say it is debatable.

You're 100% right, however, is it really worth debating with children? Not really.

[mhockey21]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 09:36 PM, said:

You're 100% right, however, is it really worth debating with children? Not really.

Children? Really? You're continued use of that phrase is really starting to hold less meaning than it did before.  Most people on this site, me included are older and vastly more mature than you are.  I would appreciate it if you stopped calling me a child.  I do not need to PM you this.  IF you were mature you would realize the slap in the face it is to disrespect someone like that.

[_BD6_]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 11:36 PM, said:

You're 100% right, however, is it really worth debating with children? Not really.

You keep calling people children, when you are in fact one yourself.

[7-5-7]

KrisKringle, on Nov 27 2010, 11:50 PM, said:

Children? Really? You're continued use of that phrase is really starting to hold less meaning than it did before.  Most people on this site, me included are older and vastly more mature than you are.  I would appreciate it if you stopped calling me a child.  I do not need to PM you this.  IF you were mature you would realize the slap in the face it is to disrespect someone like that.

I didn't specifically call anyone a child. I simply noted that it is not worth the time to argue with children.

uber-N69204, on Nov 27 2010, 11:52 PM, said:

You keep calling people children, when you are in fact one yourself.

Indeed I am a child, I will be until my eighteenth birthday. Secondly, where exactly did I call someone a child in that sentence? Fail.

[LA_PHX]

Just in case people didn't get enough of them already.