142 replies to this topic

[7-5-7]

Element94, on Nov 26 2010, 11:38 PM, said:

I'd really like some of what you're smoking, please...It sounds much better than the tumbleweed I have.
You can't win a popular vote with minorities, poindexter

The popular vote is worthless. Additionally, when you add up minorities you usually can out number the, "regulars." Especially in the United States.

Flying_Pie, on Nov 26 2010, 11:48 PM, said:

Ignore him dude, you don't have a chance (that's not an insult, it's just not possible to break him).

Ignore what exactly? This is what I mean. When a post doesn't match your opinion, it's automatically trolling. How stupid.

[Gym_Class_Hero]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 10:41 AM, said:

Ignore what exactly? This is what I mean. When a post doesn't match your opinion, it's automatically trolling. How stupid.

The irony

[Flying_Pie]

___, on Nov 26 2010, 10:31 PM, said:

The irony

sssshhhh Don't acknowledge him.

[Element94]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 12:11 AM, said:

The popular vote is worthless. Additionally, when you add up minorities you usually can out number the, "regulars." Especially in the United States.

The popular vote is the key to winning all elections except the presidency. Even then, whites compose 75% of the US Population. Tell me how adding up the minorities will be able to win against that?

Source: http://factfinder.ce...b...=&-_lang=en

[Romario_]

Really and truly, it doesn't matter who is the president, the costs are not going to change. Heck, if Palin wins 2012, she'll probably use AF1 ever weekend for wolf hunting . In regards to Obama, yea, he as his faults but I think that he hasn't done that bad.

[Alaska_MD-83]

[7-5-7]

Element94, on Nov 27 2010, 08:07 AM, said:

The popular vote is the key to winning all elections except the presidency. Even then, whites compose 75% of the US Population. Tell me how adding up the minorities will be able to win against that?

Source: http://factfinder.ce...b...=&-_lang=en

Well... weren't we kind of talking about the presidency? Blacks and hispanics cover about 35% of the spectrum, with Asians taking 5%. If you were to get a popular vote that included 30% of these, you would only need a little over half of whites in the popular vote. If you win the popular vote, you usually win the electoral college.

Santa_Claus, on Nov 27 2010, 09:02 AM, said:

Really and truly, it doesn't matter who is the president, the costs are not going to change. Heck, if Palin wins 2012, she'll probably use AF1 ever weekend for wolf hunting . In regards to Obama, yea, he as his faults but I think that he hasn't done that bad.

What the heck does that mean? You're telling me the Republicans believe in high taxes and spending to fix the economy? I don't think so.

Palin won't win in 2012, shes already screwed it up for herself.

Obama has done very bad. He has betrayed the American people by shoving healthcare down their throats, which ultimately resulted in the changing of house majority.

Alaska_MD-83, on Nov 27 2010, 12:14 PM, said:

I bet he knows there's only 50 states though, if he does, he's already smarter than Obama!

Edited by 7-5-7, 27 November 2010 - 12:23 PM.

[E-Jet]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 01:22 PM, said:

Well... weren't we kind of talking about the presidency? Blacks and hispanics cover about 35% of the spectrum, with Asians taking 5%. If you were to get a popular vote that included 30% of these, you would only need a little over half of whites in the popular vote. If you win the popular vote, you usually win the electoral college.
What the heck does that mean? You're telling me the Republicans believe in high taxes and spending to fix the economy? I don't think so.

Palin won't win in 2012, shes already screwed it up for herself.

Obama has done very bad. He has betrayed the American people by shoving healthcare down their throats, which ultimately resulted in the changing of house majority.
I bet he knows there's only 50 states though, if he does, he's already smarter than Obama!

Another example of why we will be ignoring you.

Edited by Embraer, 27 November 2010 - 12:26 PM.

[Flying_Pie]

Embraer, on Nov 27 2010, 10:25 AM, said:

Another example of why we will be ignoring you.

Except you're not with this post. Shhhh

[7-5-7]

Embraer, on Nov 27 2010, 12:25 PM, said:

Another example of why we will be ignoring you.

Well, didn't you just acknowledge me? Fail.

[Flying_Pie]

Alaska_MD-83, on Nov 27 2010, 10:14 AM, said:

I agree with many of his views, but I don't know how people can sit and watch (or listen to) this man speak, he's just such a tool.

[7-5-7]

Flying_Pie, on Nov 27 2010, 12:28 PM, said:

I agree with many of his views, but I don't know how people can sit and watch (or listen to) this man speak, he's just such a tool.

I'll admit he's a crazy SOB but he makes good points. He's kind of like Palin, I wouldn't vote her into public office but I'd listen to her talk.

[pieterjan456]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 01:27 PM, said:

Well, didn't you just acknowledge me? Fail.

You are a complete fail.

[7-5-7]

pieterjan456, on Nov 27 2010, 12:37 PM, said:

You are a complete fail.

The classic response.

[Gym_Class_Hero]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 11:09 PM, said:

The classic response.

[Brandon-M]

Embraer, on Nov 27 2010, 10:25 AM, said:

Another example of why we will be ignoring you.

Feel free to read this in a really condescending tone.

You see 757, will is the future tense. That means, and let me make this as simple as possible for you, we will be ignoring you. In the future. So it wasn't a "fail". Now, run along little boy.

Edited by Bender, 27 November 2010 - 12:47 PM.

[7-5-7]

Bender, on Nov 27 2010, 12:47 PM, said:

Feel free to read this in a really condescending tone.

You see 757, will is the future tense. That means, and let me make this as simple as possible for you, we will be ignoring you. In the future. So it wasn't a "fail". Now, run along little boy.

Right. Well, you big boys better get to work, because yet again I have been acknowledged.

[Brandon-M]

7-5-7, on Nov 27 2010, 10:50 AM, said:

Right. Well, you big boys better get to work, because yet again I have been acknowledged.

Do you have a mental disability?

[7-5-7]

Bender, on Nov 27 2010, 12:55 PM, said:

Do you have a mental disability?

Of course not!

[Gym_Class_Hero]

Bender, on Nov 27 2010, 11:25 PM, said:

Do you have a mental disability?

If self-induced stupidity is?