1113 replies to this topic

[Brandon-M]

Pierre., on Sep 21 2007, 08:16 AM, said:

radioactive_ham, on Sep 21 2007, 05:42 PM, said:

as737700, on Sep 20 2007, 01:31 PM, said:

The colors look really weird...too blue I think.  Did you mess around with the colors or is that how it was when you first shot it.  Also, with the ACA E90, post the registration, I'm sure someone could help you find the CN.

Yea it got rejected, not for colours but for dark underexposed..so ill go back to photoshop and try to fix it

The reg of the E90 is C-FHLH, i sent an email to the census thing telling them, but does anyone know the serial?

c/n: 19000068

Cheers mate

[Pierre.]

A good resource for that is Airframes.org:

http://www.airframes.org/

[Brandon-M]

Thanks for that, the jp.net census is odd to me.

[Capt. Bulb]

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1598455

Reason(s) For Rejection:
- JPG compression artefacts

I don't see that much of a problem with it.

[Captain-Amar]

I don't really think these would make it but I need a second opinion":

[.Kevin]

Wow

[prince]

Amar.. http://images.flight...1214/maybe2.jpg
2nd shot i think its cause the amount of zoon/crop that kinda blur the image and out of focus....

here's an example of my shots - just to clarify what ive explained.... what kinda lense are u using?

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=6039902

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=5986657

Edited by prince, 22 September 2007 - 10:27 AM.

[Captain-Amar]

none its from a camcorder. Its a F3.5 380mm lens but ok. I knew they where crap but I just wanted some feedback

[Fokker_F27]

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1602658

Will this one get rejected because it's zoomed out too far? The idea was to get some sky along with the shot.

[Gym_Class_Hero]

Zoomed out, not centered, and back lit.

[as737700]

Fokker_F27, on Sep 22 2007, 01:04 PM, said:

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1602658

Will this one get rejected because it's zoomed out too far? The idea was to get some sky along with the shot.

Sometimes they'll be a little less picky on shots with interesting backgrounds like that, but the plane isn't centered.

[AmericanAirFan]

Capt. Bulb, on Sep 21 2007, 02:52 PM, said:

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1598455

Reason(s) For Rejection:
- JPG compression artefacts

I don't see that much of a problem with it.

The Quality is underpar due to compression...

-AmericanAirFan

[Capt. Bulb]

Ok.

This...



or...



Im sure one of them has to get accepted as I just had another version of it rejected for the wrong ratio.

[.Kevin]

Second 1

[as737700]

The second one looks much better.  The aircraft is too high in the frame on the first one.

[Capt. Bulb]

Yeah, I liked the first one because it had the runway in but eventually I sent the second one in... knowing me they will reject it again for some other reason despite the only last problem been the ratio.

[.Kevin]

this Topic is pinned!

[Mul.]

*raises hand* I'm the bad boy that pinned this thread. Seems as though it's being put to good use, so why risk it sink to Page 2?

Of course I am going to have to insist that you all use this thread for anything referred to a.net/jp.net screening rather than making a new thread, now!

Mul.

[Brandon-M]

Mul., on Sep 26 2007, 10:17 AM, said:

*raises hand* I'm the bad boy that pinned this thread. Seems as though it's being put to good use, so why risk it sink to Page 2?

Of course I am going to have to insist that you all use this thread for anything referred to a.net/jp.net screening rather than making a new thread, now!

Mul.

Cheers mul, this will be a great help

[Capt. Bulb]

Feel free to merge my thread now, Ive had my moment of glory