1113 replies to this topic

[.Kevin]

Rejection Reason(s):
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
- Oversharpen

[Pierre.]

Looks soft, not oversharpened

[as737700]

Capt. Bulb, on Sep 19 2007, 05:04 AM, said:

How about this version? I cropped out the wing and re-edited it from scratch.

Looks a lot better IMO

Pierre., on Sep 19 2007, 06:17 AM, said:

Looks soft, not oversharpened

I agree   Looks soft and perhaps too much dead space on the left.

Edited by as737700, 19 September 2007 - 04:47 PM.

[.Kevin]

ok

[Brandon-M]

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1597845



Im not as sure with this one...and there was this really good one of an ACA E90, but the reg isnt in the census

[.Kevin]

Pierre., on Sep 19 2007, 03:17 PM, said:

Looks soft, not oversharpened

How can I fix that?

[.Kevin]

For Jp.Net?

[Chief_Bean]

kleham, on Sep 20 2007, 10:23 PM, said:

For Jp.Net?

Nope.

Don't start asking me why, but it won't

[.Kevin]

ok   

[as737700]

radioactive_ham, on Sep 20 2007, 09:46 AM, said:

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1597845



Im not as sure with this one...and there was this really good one of an ACA E90, but the reg isnt in the census

The colors look really weird...too blue I think.  Did you mess around with the colors or is that how it was when you first shot it.  Also, with the ACA E90, post the registration, I'm sure someone could help you find the CN.

kleham, on Sep 20 2007, 12:15 PM, said:

Pierre., on Sep 19 2007, 03:17 PM, said:

Looks soft, not oversharpened

How can I fix that?

Do you have any sort of editing software installed on your computer?  I'd recommend Irfanview or GIMP, they're both free and usually get the job done when it comes to horizon, sharpening, cropping, colors, etc.

kleham, on Sep 20 2007, 02:23 PM, said:

For Jp.Net?

Horizon unlevel, blurry, part of aircraft cut off, dark...still looks cool though

[Capt. Bulb]

Which is the best to try for JP.net you think? Sort of hot photo.

[Cactus]

I prefer the first to the second, only because the second appears blurry around the tail. But I prefer the angle on the second.

Sorry, how is it 'hot' ?

[Capt. Bulb]

Duke, on Sep 20 2007, 11:25 PM, said:

Sorry, how is it 'hot' ?

As far as im aware it hasnt been logged at EGNM yet.

[MIA-PILOT]

nice i like the scond i think it could make it imo

[as737700]

Capt. Bulb, on Sep 20 2007, 03:28 PM, said:

Duke, on Sep 20 2007, 11:25 PM, said:

Sorry, how is it 'hot' ?

As far as im aware it hasnt been logged at EGNM yet.

That's not a valid reason to upload it as "hot".  It's only a hot photo if it's a new airline, new aircraft type for an airlines, accident, etc.  I also prefer to the first shot, although it appears soft.

[Mr. Schutte]

They are very picky about their "Hot" photos, I submitted a shot of the new delta livery, when there were only about 3 or 4 on airliners.net and maybe 4 on jetphotos, and it wasn't "Hot" anymore.

[.Kevin]

as737700, on Sep 20 2007, 11:31 PM, said:

radioactive_ham, on Sep 20 2007, 09:46 AM, said:

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1597845



Im not as sure with this one...and there was this really good one of an ACA E90, but the reg isnt in the census

The colors look really weird...too blue I think.  Did you mess around with the colors or is that how it was when you first shot it.  Also, with the ACA E90, post the registration, I'm sure someone could help you find the CN.

kleham, on Sep 20 2007, 12:15 PM, said:

Pierre., on Sep 19 2007, 03:17 PM, said:

Looks soft, not oversharpened

How can I fix that?

Do you have any sort of editing software installed on your computer?  I'd recommend Irfanview or GIMP, they're both free and usually get the job done when it comes to horizon, sharpening, cropping, colors, etc.

kleham, on Sep 20 2007, 02:23 PM, said:

For Jp.Net?

Horizon unlevel, blurry, part of aircraft cut off, dark...still looks cool though

I have Adobe Photoshop Cs2

[Capt. Bulb]

as737700, on Sep 21 2007, 01:22 AM, said:

Capt. Bulb, on Sep 20 2007, 03:28 PM, said:

Duke, on Sep 20 2007, 11:25 PM, said:

Sorry, how is it 'hot' ?

As far as im aware it hasnt been logged at EGNM yet.

That's not a valid reason to upload it as "hot".  It's only a hot photo if it's a new airline, new aircraft type for an airlines, accident, etc.  I also prefer to the first shot, although it appears soft.

Yeh I didn't upload it as "hot" I just left a comment to the screeners about it.

[Brandon-M]

as737700, on Sep 20 2007, 01:31 PM, said:

The colors look really weird...too blue I think.  Did you mess around with the colors or is that how it was when you first shot it.  Also, with the ACA E90, post the registration, I'm sure someone could help you find the CN.

Yea it got rejected, not for colours but for dark underexposed..so ill go back to photoshop and try to fix it

The reg of the E90 is C-FHLH, i sent an email to the census thing telling them, but does anyone know the serial?

[Pierre.]

radioactive_ham, on Sep 21 2007, 05:42 PM, said:

as737700, on Sep 20 2007, 01:31 PM, said:

The colors look really weird...too blue I think.  Did you mess around with the colors or is that how it was when you first shot it.  Also, with the ACA E90, post the registration, I'm sure someone could help you find the CN.

Yea it got rejected, not for colours but for dark underexposed..so ill go back to photoshop and try to fix it

The reg of the E90 is C-FHLH, i sent an email to the census thing telling them, but does anyone know the serial?

c/n: 19000068