1113 replies to this topic

[Brandon-M]

Nice bulb! Might make jp.net

[Fokker_F27]

Yours might make it, Bulb. Fix the yellowness first, though.

[Tim.]

Bulb,

Its...
-Too far to the right.
-There's some strange colour cast. Sort out the white balance on it.
-And if Mr. Screener was feeling really mean, there'd be too much noise.

[Capt. Bulb]

Tim., on Sep 17 2007, 06:00 PM, said:

Bulb,

Its...
-Too far to the right.
-There's some strange colour cast. Sort out the white balance on it.
-And if Mr. Screener was feeling really mean, there'd be too much noise.

Thats all there is of the aircraft, I could try crop more of the buildings off on the left, if not I have a similar shot showing all the aircraft.

Cant really see the strange colour myself but you could point it out to me and I will give it a go.

There probably is too much noise, it was shot with an ISO speed of 400  

Im heading back to the airport on thursday to try again with a lower ISO.

Thanks.

I current have one which is position 81 in the queue but I don't think it will make it.

[bigflyersmallbyer]

tako, on Sep 13 2007, 06:13 PM, said:

Reason(s) For Rejection:
- Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
- Bad Info in the following field(s): Serial Number/CN


Reason(s) For Rejection:
- Cropping / Photo edges


Any fixes? I give up on JP.net...

I don't have any fixes but just wanted to say they look amazing!!!!! don't see what A net geeks have been smoking but that deserves the A Net Badge of approval..

[Tim.]

Capt. Bulb, on Sep 17 2007, 08:26 PM, said:

Tim., on Sep 17 2007, 06:00 PM, said:

Bulb,

Its...
-Too far to the right.
-There's some strange colour cast. Sort out the white balance on it.
-And if Mr. Screener was feeling really mean, there'd be too much noise.

Thats all there is of the aircraft, I could try crop more of the buildings off on the left, if not I have a similar shot showing all the aircraft.

Cant really see the strange colour myself but you could point it out to me and I will give it a go.

There probably is too much noise, it was shot with an ISO speed of 400  

Im heading back to the airport on thursday to try again with a lower ISO.

Thanks.

I current have one which is position 81 in the queue but I don't think it will make it.

You'll have a better chance with the full aircraft one, half of the plane photos can be hard getting on.

As for the colour cast, if you have Adobe Gamma or something similar try and calibrate your monitor, you might be able to see it (the yellowish cast).

[Capt. Bulb]

Cheers Tim.

I had this rejected eariler: http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1593639

Reason(s) for Rejection:
- Too much noise or grain
- Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)

Fair enough, I used the wrong ISO so next time it should be that grainy. And maybe the white balance was wrong, should be able to sort it out with some better editing for future photos.

Maybe I will have a chance after Thursday if the weather is good.

[AmericanAirFan]

bigflyersmallbyer, on Sep 17 2007, 03:11 PM, said:

tako, on Sep 13 2007, 06:13 PM, said:

Reason(s) For Rejection:
- Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
- Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)
- Bad Info in the following field(s): Serial Number/CN


Reason(s) For Rejection:
- Cropping / Photo edges


Any fixes? I give up on JP.net...

I don't have any fixes but just wanted to say they look amazing!!!!! don't see what A net geeks have been smoking but that deserves the A Net Badge of approval..

A.net geeks rather eat their daily photography vitamins while people who don't understand why they would get rejected are the smokees   but overtime through a little screening rehab over time it gets better

-AmericanAirFan

[prince]

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1596748

taken early september....just finished processing

[Brandon-M]

All three of mine made it
-

Nice edwin!!!  

[Capt. Bulb]

Still not too sure  

[Brandon-M]

Still looks quite yellow.

EDIT: forget that lol

Very nice shot though!

Edited by radioactive_ham, 18 September 2007 - 02:05 PM.

[Capt. Bulb]

Looks a bit dull now, not sure how to level this one, there isnt a straight edge to go off, bare in mind the aircraft is in the "loop" so the runway isnt straight.

[Brandon-M]

Im willing to bet that that will make it mate!

Mabey a bit of sharpening too,

I assume you have CS2?

Ok well if you right click on the eye dropper, the thing you use to take the colour off a pic, go to the measure tool and just draw a line along the tarmack or whatever is meant to be flat. Then got image, rotate, arbitrary, and click ok!

Edited by radioactive_ham, 18 September 2007 - 02:32 PM.

[as737700]

Capt Bulb, it's still not centered.  It's too low in the frame.  It also looks like it may be soft...there's something about it that just doesn't look right

[prince]

upload the original ones...bulb

Edited by prince, 18 September 2007 - 09:23 PM.

[Tako]

Well... Turns out that I used the wrong reg for the AA because there were 2 75's there around the same time. I just saw the number on the nose gear and used a.net to find it, but I found the correct n # for the one I took. So a quick fix there. I am still confused however, as to why it is not properly framed, as for I thought including the control tower would be a good idea. I suppose not

I will correct and resubmit when I have time later in the week, thanks for all the tips guys!

ANY chance for these? I'm guessing no, but if there is hope, let me know











Best one of the bunch really, but it needs fixes...


Thanks for looking!

[as737700]

tako, on Sep 18 2007, 07:59 PM, said:

Well... Turns out that I used the wrong reg for the AA because there were 2 75's there around the same time. I just saw the number on the nose gear and used a.net to find it, but I found the correct n # for the one I took. So a quick fix there. I am still confused however, as to why it is not properly framed, as for I thought including the control tower would be a good idea. I suppose not

If you want to keep the tower in the shot than be sure that you keep an equal amount of extra space on the other side of the aircraft.  As I said before, the aircraft is closer to the left of the frame than the right, so just add more space on the left and it'll be fine.

tako, on Sep 18 2007, 07:59 PM, said:

ANY chance for these? I'm guessing no, but if there is hope, let me know











Best one of the bunch really, but it needs fixes...


Thanks for looking!

I think that #2 looks good.  Still doesn't look 100%, but it probably could be fixed if you ask me.

prince, on Sep 17 2007, 08:50 PM, said:

http://www.jetphotos....php?id=1596748

taken early september....just finished processing

Is it just me or is it leaning to the left a little bit?  Looks good though  

Edited by as737700, 18 September 2007 - 10:17 PM.

[Cactus]

Tako: First two with some editing would make Jetphotos

[Capt. Bulb]

How about this version? I cropped out the wing and re-edited it from scratch.